Tuesday, 12 July 2016

Research on Social Storytelling

The following questions and answers were originally recorded for a friend of mine (Daniel Waldon) who was completing the final year of his Bachelors degree. The research proposal looked at how Transmedia is effecting the landscape of social storytelling, with a particular focus on the theory of Convergence Culture in which fans seek out extra content from a film or piece of art. 

The following interview questions are an attempt to gain an understanding of art, from the perspective of someone working within a creative media outlet. However following the interview, I found that the answers gave an interesting insight into what my passions are and how I perceive the media industry in general. And now, hopefully, you also gain some value from this work:

Firstly, I would like to know what is your art medium? (E.G Illustrator, Actor, Writer, etc…)

I’d say my art is video production. I mostly work as a camera operator, but my real passion is writing and directing.

What is your usual process when producing your art form?

As a camera operator the first focus is communication. What does the director / client want from the shot? The visual look of a film project can be changed dramatically (and the wrong look be applied) if an idea isn’t communicated properly.

From there I would be able to look at lenses, lighting and framing the image for the shot. Once the DP (Director of photography), Director or client is satisfied the filming can begin.

Do you have any special rituals you undertake?

I wouldn’t say I have many rituals, although I would say my technique has become more punctual. As I’ve gained more experience in producing video content, I’ve learned invaluable knowledge on what is and isn’t necessary for a particular shoot. It may sound silly, but knowing what you need and not having to navigate through a heavy load of gear is a real time saver.

How knowledgeable of the theory behind your art form are you?

I could write all day on the “theory” of film and video production but in terms of practical application it’s a whole other ball game. You definitely draw upon your theoretical knowledge while shooting a video but each project is it’s own beast. You plan out the shoot, write down shot lists, storyboard and then when the day of the shoot comes it might not click. So in them times you experiment. You try something different, go at it from another angle. And in the end, you end up with something that works.

How would you best describe the mindset you are in whist undertaking your art form?

I’m relaxed. I’ve done all my planning and I know what I’m doing. I focus on the task at hand and do it. And in the times when I’m waiting, I sit back and enjoy the art as a spectator.

Have you ever experienced art block in one form or another? (The ability to not create)

Yes definitely. Sometimes you can be on a roll, coming up with new ideas and projects you want to do and then boom, nothing. You can be working on a script, doing a storyboard; going over a shot list, and the ideas (the visualisation of what you want to achieve) just isn’t coming to you.

In the end though the best thing is to stick with it and push through. You realise that this is something you believe in and if you’ve gotten this far then you can make it through till the end.

If so, as accurately as you can, describe the emotions and feelings that went around your head?

When you experience that kind of creative block, it’s as though you’re stuck. You experience this kind of stunted feeling where you can’t see how you're goanna get out of it. It’s not an anxiety or depression like feeling, but… more of a difficult problem to overcome. It’s like walking along a beautiful country lane and discovering a large object blocking your way. Now you could end your journey there, walk away and leave the object blocking the path. But you want to keep going forward. You want to keep going on this amazing journey, and so you put in the effort, you take the strain and deal with the task at hand.

What exercises do you do to attempt to relieve the burden of art block?

In the past I would often be working on multiple projects at anyone time, so I would regularly go from one project to another in order to keep my mind fresh on each of them. However I found that this doesn’t always work. Often it ends up just giving you the excuse to slack off on projects.

Now what I do is breakdown what the focus is of each project. Lets say for example I’m working on a script. I’ve written a first draft but one scene isn’t working. What’ll do is breakdown the scene: what is it about, what is its point (and place) in the overall narrative? If it has information or something necessary to the script then I’ll reformat the scene. If it doesn’t I’ll discard it.

How far would you go, in terms of submission to art, to create?

I think we go as far as reason lets us. Obviously different people have different opinions on what they think is reasonable behaviour in-terms of submission to an art project. Damien Hurst put a shark into a tank preserved in formaldehyde. Some people would say that’s too far. To display a dead animal like that. Theo Van Gogh was murdered because he made a film with Ayaan Hirsi Ali that questioned the fundamentals of some religious practices. Is that too far? Is that to much of a sacrifice, to lose your life for making a film that discusses what some may consider “controversial issues.”

Speaking for myself though, how far would I go? I’d invest my valuable time, my money, my mind and my body into a project that I believed in. Luckily for me then my creative forum for expression is fiction based film projects. Which, lets face it, only requires my money, time, mind and a minimal strain on my body: mostly lifting and moving equipment.

Do you study other art forms in order to improve your own?

How could you not? I’ve learned so much about classical paintings, architecture, photography, classical music, theatre and literature. All of them have contributed to my knowledge of film production, from lighting, screenwriting, directing, shot composition, shot lighting, use of location and every facet imaginable in terms of storytelling.

Exposing yourself to these different art mediums and analysing their correlating motifs dramatically improves your ability to create with precision in your own area of interest.

If so, what art forms and how do you find that they help you with your own creativity?

For instance one thing that I like to look at is renaissance landscape paintings and similar art that that inspired. When I look at these paintings what stands out is how they capture so much emotion and drama in such a wide space. In Hollywood cinema today, it’s the close up that dominates. So much so that Oscar winners like Birdman are dominated by the close up and yet are still considered triumphs.

You see the thing is, it’s not always the biggest hyped films that leave the biggest mark, but those that do something different comfortably that stand out most to me. Lena Dunham’s Tiny Furniture and the films of Alan Clarke stand out because they are stylistically (in particular, their use of framing the shot) different.

Another example would be the influence of literature on how I think about story telling. In the past few years, shows like Breaking Bad and others have embraced a more novelistic form of storytelling. To better understand this slower form of character driven storytelling, I’ve read novels by highly praised authors. One of the standout books would have to be Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy. The methodical way that Tolstoy tells this story and develops his characters really helped me breakdown and understand this form of character progression.

Actors often turn to method acting to get into character, can you relate to this? Is there such a thing as method creation?

As I see it, method acting is drawing on emotional events and knowledge in order to represent the way a character that they are portraying is feeling… and if that’s the case, I don’t know of any creative person who doesn’t draw upon some kind of collected knowledge in order to construct a piece of art.

Method acting is often given this kooky spin, as though method actors believe they are that character. It’s about maintaining the right mind-set for emotionally portraying a certain character. And if that’s the case, then I think there’s undoubtedly a kind of method creation.

Does your art form support your lifestyle or do you have another job in order to raise your own personal finance? How does this make you feel?

I do have another job to support my lifestyle yes. But I accept this for now. It’s a motivational tool. I know that I have the ability to make a living producing video and film content, and it’s up to me to find an avenue or revenue stream that can support me not only financially but also provide an adequate place for me to express myself creatively.

How does your life reflect the Art form you practice? How does it affect the way you live?

I’m not sure it does really. And I’ve met a lot of people who feel the same. I’ve worked on corporate video projects, short films, web series and produced professional photographs for advertisement purposes, yet none of the achievements I’ve made have been rewarded aptly in a financial sense.

Luckily I know how to live frugally. I write scripts that can be produced on a tight budget and often plan out films with locations already in mind. I suppose that in some ways, it forces you to be more creative. To expand your boundaries on subjects you might tackle. If we could all afford to fund whatever vanity project we might secretly have in mind, a lot of great pieces of art would never have been produced.

It is often said there is a heightened vulnerability with the production of art? Do you agree or disagree with this? Why?

To some extent there is a heightened risk in the production of art. Who is your audience, what is it about, what other things are similar to it? This doesn’t happen too much with other properties. You wouldn’t get KFC advertising that it is similar to McDonalds. But films are often market for their similarities to pre-established brands.

In Hollywood producers only want to invest in known properties. Comics, novels, plays and TV shows are all fair gain because they have an established audience on which to build on. But they miss the boat. Marvel didn’t become the entity it is (with it’s vast cast of established characters) by sticking to a get rich quick scheme formula. They got there because they allowed writers to create new and interesting properties: characters with interesting aspects and tragic flaws. The writers and creators there were allowed to create and experiment and it worked in establishing a dedicated audience.

If there is anyone in the film industry with a hyper sense of “heightened vulnerability with the production of art” then it is the Hollywood investors and producers themselves. They’ve lost faith in their own ability to create original content that audiences will actually want to watch.

Content producers or artists, whichever moniker you prefer, may at times come across as cynical or jaded. But they haven’t lost hope. Students continually fill universities to study art and it’s methods of production. They produce content on small and large scales, in collaboration with large corporations or independently, and each of them has their audiences. The fact is that people want to be moved. They want to be challenged and see things that make them think. People want to be stimulated by the art they consume. And no matter what a projects budget is the target audience will usually gravitate towards it.

Finally, imagine you could no longer produce your art form, how would you feel? (For this question I am looking at the raw emotions we feel as human beings when frustration no longer allows us to express ourselves)

I would feel like something had been taken from me: as though a part of myself was gone and that I would have to live the rest of my life without it. Yet, like the passing of a loved one I would begin to reflect with nostalgia. I would cherish the memories and opportunities that I had to express myself. To do things and fulfil my passions in a way that many people are unable to do in their lifetimes.

Wednesday, 15 June 2016

Honing Your Passions

Recently a creative friend of mine asked me if I could help him by answering a few questions. The aim was to help breakdown what an individual feels most passionate about and where their greatest strengths lie. 

However after I had completed answering the questions I began to realise that asking those same questions to myself may be of a great benefit. Often creatively, I find myself being pulled in many directions in pursuing various creative goals and projects. Yet this kind of flippancy can often leave you feeling drained and unsatisfied. The lack of focus of going from one random creative venture to another lacks a sense of progression in anyone creative field.

So, whilst I do enjoy doing film reviews, photography work and various video projects I do think it would be beneficial to myself to try and pinpoint and then focus on where my true passions lie. Therefore, bellow here you will find the results of these questions:


What Do I Do Well?

I’m a smart guy and I’m very good at putting together intelligent, well thought out films and videos. I’m a good writer and have a real flair for storytelling: whether through the medium of a film review, a formal essay, a fictional script, a non-fiction documentary or advertisement.

I’m also good at dealing with and motivating others to pursue their passions and push their own boundaries, no matter what their endeavors may be.

I care for people and the work I do. I’m passionate in my creative outlets and push myself to do better. And try to simplify and streamline the processes where necessary.


What Do I Feel Passionate About?

I’m passionate about people. I enjoy the company of others and like listening to what they have to say. I like to be challenged; I like to hear other people’s perspectives on things, especially when they may view things in a way I have never heard of before.

I like going on journeys: in narratives, in cinema, in books I read and in real life as well. I like to go off the beaten path. I want to see new things, things that excite me, new things that I haven’t seen before. And I want to create journeys like this; journeys that I can experience and embellish upon: experiences that I can create and share with others and show them new and exciting things as well.


What Do I Think I Am Uniquely Gifted In Doing?

Honestly, I think I’m uniquely gifted with a true open-mindedness. I have a passion and determination to create things and push boundaries wherever I can. I also pride myself on helping others and honing their potential into practical solutions.

My even flowing passions for creative projects (films, photography and writing) push me to persevere and encourage others to do the same. I am never happier than when I am hard at work on a creative endeavor and pushing for the project to be the best it can be.


What are my talents and abilities?

I think I’m a very creative person. When necessary, I have often gone outside of my comfort zone and produced quality content in fields I have been unfamiliar in.

I also have good leadership qualities (in helping and motivating others forward) whilst not being over zealous or forceful.

I have a decent understanding of lighting and photography, but I’d say my greatest strength is in my mastery of storytelling and filmic sequential techniques. Also my writing abilities have come on leaps and bounds in the past few years, as I have made it a priority to improve on weak areas in my knowledge base.

When I find problems I make moves to come up with practical ways of solving them. In this way I’m very pragmatic; although on occasions I do have a tendency to over think things, I more often than not overcome this slight deficit.


What can I be trusted to deliver, and is there anything else that makes me special?

I can be trusted to deliver high quality (professional standard) video and photographic content. Whether working on a small or a larger scale, I have always prided myself on my ability to over come limitations and challenges that have come before me; I would even go as far as saying that I have often not only learned a great deal from these challenges, but also that I have continuously thrived in these situations.

No matter what the task is, I can be trusted to push myself, and in collaborative work encourage others to go as far as possible to create a great product. I pride myself on my creative adaptability and my ability to experiment on different projects. I’m not afraid to try new things if I believe it could provide a practical solution to the task at hand.


In terms of specialties, I’d say I have a very good ability to breakdown complex ideas (or narratives) and analyze them in a way that makes them much easier to understand. I often analyse films I’ve watched and review the aspects that worked and the ones I believe did not. By doing this, it allows me to gain a greater understanding of why successful (or popular) films work and why others don’t. Which also helps to hone in on what would work for my own projects.

Saturday, 1 February 2014

My DIY Steadicam


After constructing a DIY Steadicam, it was only logical to try and test the newly constructed device out. Below this text is a number of video clips I have filmed as examples of what can be achieved with the use of the Steadicam.


For those interested in the device itself, it is based off a variety of designs including Zack King’s $15 Steadicam; Kip Kedersha’s $14 Steadicam; Matt Chapman’s $30 Steadicam; and most importantly, Johnny Lee’s Poor Man’s Steadicam: of which all of the previously mentioned designs derive from.

Videos coming soon. 

Thursday, 30 January 2014

Snorricam Production Tutorials

(The following entry is from my previous university blog and is a direct transfer to my new website for future reference.)



I came across this tutorial after watching it on YouTube whilst looking for a viable design to base my own on. This design in my opinion would be a very good example of which to base my own off of because it is very secure looking and has been intentionally designed for use with a DSLR.



This example of a Snorricam construction is made by a internet based company Indy Mogul who often make DIY constructions of film making equipment. The design seems easy to make however from the video tutorial it doesn't appear as endurable as the design above. With me owning a Canon 7d I wouldn't want to risk making a design that could give way and possibly damage either my camera or lenses.

Snorricam Film Example Analysis

(The following entry is from my previous university blog and is a direct transfer to my new website for future reference.)

I've recently been looking into making a Snorricam for use in my final year film and before doing so I thought it would be a good idea to look at some examples of its use in contemporary cinema. My aim for this being to examine the use of the device in context with the scene it was used in. Also I would like to deconstruct how the device influences the mise-en-scene of a scene and in particular what message this sends to the audience.




The first example I have chosen is from the 1973 Martin Scorsese film Mean Streets. In this scene, Charlie, played by a young Harvey Keitel has been heavily drinking with the effects of which beginning to show. However Scorsese doesn't opt for showing Charlie in a wider shot, instead he stays in close up in the characters personnel space. Also in playing close attention to the performance you notice that Harvey Keitel isn't trying to over play the fact that his character is drunk, in fact he is underplaying this as someone who was really drunk would. 


Michael Kane addresses this idea in an interview I watched recently:



In this clip he discusses coming into a role as a young actor to play a drunk man where he began his performance in which he was slurring his words. He was then stopped when one of the producers asked what he was doing? He replied by saying he was acting drunk to which the producer retorted that he was an actor trying to walk crocked and speak slurred, whereas a drunk is a man trying to walk straight and talk properly. Scorsese realizes this and instead uses the Snorricam to highlight how Keitel's character is really feeling inside as opposed to the way he is trying to appear on the outside. By using the Snorricam for this sequence Scorsese is able to manipulate the mise-en-scene, and with the use of the song Rubber Biscuit by The Chips he fever extenuates the feeling of unease in the characters mind.



In this second clip from Darren Aronofsky's Requiem for a Dream, Marion played by Jennifer Connelly has just had sex for money in order to feed her heroin addiction. After this she feels very uncomfortable and is uneasy to her surroundings. Marion has also not had her regular fix that in itself would cause paranoia. In the use of close up and a very wide angle lens Aronofsky has created a large depth of field, which gives the appearance of there being never ending hallways. Although they still appear to be rather narrow it gives a really strong felling of claustrophobia throughout the sequence. This only heightens as she enters an elevator already occupied by two men, giving the viewer an uncomfortable feeling as though these men surround us to. With the Snorricam in use being intercut from both in front and from behind. We are forced as an audience to engage with both the closed confinement of the lift doors and the disparaging stares from the men behind her. We are relieved as the doors open, with Marion anxiously rushing out of the doors and exiting the building. It is as though all of her emotions are suddenly coming to a front, as though they are about to explode. To which as she turns to leave the building she is unable to retain her emotions and shame culminating in her vomiting. 




Lastly is a more lighthearted example of the Snorricam in use. The following is a short comic film directed by Patrick Eggert in what starts out in a dream like desert landscape. A young man is lay there alone as he slowly wakes in a Snorricam shot. Standing dazed he slowly begins to look around. But as he walks forward we see the surreal sight of a gorilla swinging a golf club around in the distance as though it were on a driving range. The music continues with an air of eastern mysticism, until the still dazed man spots the Gorilla in the background. As he does so the music stops, as though the orchestra saw what was happening and like the actor did a double take. Its at this moment the man runs away which causes the music to change to a banjo playing what can only be described as redneck getaway music. 



With this example we see a more postmodern surreal take on the Snorricam. Through previous examples we have seen how the device is often used in dramas to bring the audience into the emotions of a character in a time of strain. The film begins by playing on this pre-known information of the Snorricam and gradually progresses into the complete opposite of the stylized realism of the previous examples. Instead it suddenly transforms into a surreal comedy.



Concluding I must note that one of the key components that repeatedly cropped up in the following examples was the use of emotional presentation. By using a Snorricam shot the director can bring the audience into the face of an actor and unlike a tripod close up we are able to travel with the actor though out different stages of an actors movement. Whereas the tripod close-up can capture a section or a part of a static sequence the Snorricam allows the audience to travel with a character thorough out a moment even to the extent as to which the audience feels as though they are in that moment themselves. 



In Mean Streets we feel the atmosphere, the mise-en-scene of Charlie drunkenly maneuvering through the bar. In Requiem for a Dream we feel the self-conscious anxieties and paranoia of the long overdrawn corridors. We feel the nausea, we feel the sickness, we feel as the character feels and that I believe is the true reason of use for a Snorricam. As it allows the director to manipulate an audience into a position of anxiousness similar to that of the character portrayed on screen.